LU 213 grenade vs Stonefish (mine): Specs Compared

AI-generated illustration · Not a photograph — Representative exterior of LU 213 grenade

ABombs, grenades & mines

LU 213 grenade

Hand grenade

AI-generated illustration · Not a photograph

Credit

ForceTally · AI-generated illustration · Not a photograph · AI-generated · OpenAI output terms · Source ↗ · Modified

BBombs, grenades & mines

Stonefish (mine)

Mine

First system

Second system

At a glance

Side by side

LU 213 grenadelarger figure on 0 of 1

None

Stonefish (mine)larger figure on 1 of 1

Diameter+925%

Counts only measures both sources give with the same scope. A larger figure is not a better system.

Measured figures

Head to head

4 of 14 rows sourced on both sides

94mm

—

Height

All recorded figures & sources

0.094 m

Height

Single source

94 mm (3.7 in)^[source]

52mm

533mm

Diameter+925%

All recorded figures & sources

0.052 m

Diameter

Single source

52 mm (2.0 in)^[source]

0.533 m

Diameter

Single source

533 mm (21.0 in)^[source]

0.28kg

—

Mass

All recorded figures & sources

0.28 kg

Mass

Single source

280 g (9.9 oz)^[source]

0.09kgFilling weight

—

Warhead mass

All recorded figures & sources

0.09 kg

Filling weight

Single source

90 g (3.2 oz)^[source]

Bars compare reported quantities only. A larger figure does not make a system better; configurations and test conditions differ.

Configuration

Details

LU 213 grenade and Stonefish (mine) configuration
Specification	LU 213 grenade	Stonefish (mine)
Type	Hand grenade^[source]	Mine^[source]
Place of origin	France^[source]	United Kingdom^[source]
Wars	War in Afghanistan^[source]	—
Manufacturer	Titanite S.A. (Titanobel)^[source]	BAE Systems^[source]
Filling	Composition B^[source]	—
Variants	—	4 Warshot has an incremental payload.^[source]
Warhead	—	aluminised PBX^[source]
Reported operators	Reported operator · France Reported operator · Sweden	—

FORCETALLY

Loading the evidence…

Preparing your view.