Lenco BearCat vs Namer: Specs Compared

FORCETALLY

Loading the evidence…

Preparing your view.

AArmoured vehicles

Non-military armored vehicle

Credit

Srđan Popović · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Resized · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Source ↗ · Modified

BArmoured vehicles

Heavy armoured personnel carrier

Credit

https://www.flickr.com/people/45644610@N03 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Resized · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Source ↗ · Modified

First system

Second system

At a glance

Lenco BearCatlarger figure on 1 of 2

Namerlarger figure on 1 of 2

Counts only measures both sources give with the same scope. A larger figure is not a better system.

Measured figures

18 of 28 rows sourced on both sides

6.1m

8.2 מטרים

Length

All recorded figures & sources

6.096 m

Length

Single source

240 in (6,096 mm)^[source]

8.2 מטרים^[source]

3.05m

Configuration

Lenco BearCat and Namer configuration
Specification	Lenco BearCat	Namer
Type	Non-military armored vehicle^[source]	Heavy armoured personnel carrier^[source]
Place of origin	United States^[source]	Israel^[source]
In service	2001–present^[source]	2008–present^[source]
Used by	See § Operators^[source]	Israel Defense Forces^[source]

Designed	2001^[source]	—

Manufacturer	Lenco Industries^[source]	IDF Ordnance (assembler)^[source]

Unit cost	US$188,793–300,000^[source]	$5 million^[source]

Produced	2001–present^[source]	2008–present^[source]

Variants	See § Variants^[source]	—

Armor	0.5–1.5 in (13–38 mm) steel plate ( NIJ Type IV+ )^[source]	Classified composite matrix of laminated ceramic – steel – nickel alloy + underlaid reactive armour . Sloped modular design.^[source]